What's exceptional about Rufe Clarke Detroit Tigers 1924 ?
Seasons:
heavier; colleges attended
Rufe Clarke of the 1924 Detroit Tigers was the heaviest (203 lbs) of the 6 pitchers who attended Davidson College.
outdid Carl Cashion of the 1914 Washington Senators (200 lbs), Buck Marrow of the 1938 Brooklyn Dodgers (200 lbs), Fred Anderson of the 1918 New York Giants (180 lbs), and Dick Marlowe of the 1956 Chicago White Sox (165 lbs), and 1 other.
outdid Carl Cashion of the 1914 Washington Senators (200 lbs), Buck Marrow of the 1938 Brooklyn Dodgers (200 lbs), Fred Anderson of the 1918 New York Giants (180 lbs), and Dick Marlowe of the 1956 Chicago White Sox (165 lbs), and 1 other.
-
Batting, pitching, fielding, personal, team, and awards data come from the archive at seanlahman.com. This database is copyright 1996-2014 by Sean Lahman. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
-
Player heights and weights have a single value for their entire career. The data come from the archive at seanlahman.com. This database is copyright 1996-2014 by Sean Lahman. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Rufe Clarke of the 1924 Detroit Tigers threw right-handed, played on a winning team, attended Davidson College, played in Navin Field, and was born in South Carolina.
Sources
- achievement score (.000 see References)
- assists (0)
- complete games (0)
- double plays (0)
- games finished (1)
- games played (2)
- games started (0)
- innings pitched (5.3)
- putouts (2)
- saves (0)
- shutouts (0)
- strikeouts (1)
- wins (0)
- balks (0)
- earned runs (2)
- errors (0)
- hit by pitch (1)
- hits (3)
- homers given up (0)
- losses (0)
- runs allowed (2)
- walks (5)
- wild pitches (0)
- age (24 yrs)
- batters faced (25)
- height (6'1")
- weight (203 lbs)
Sources
© Copyright 2016 OnlyBoth | Terms of Use | Markets | Solutions | Benchmarking

bad (1)