What's exceptional about Dave Wickersham Kansas City Athletics 1962 ?
Seasons:
more wins; losing team; season
Dave Wickersham of the Kansas City Athletics had the 9th-most wins (11) of the 144 pitchers in 1962 who played on a losing team.
beat out by Dick Donovan of the Cleveland Indians (20), Gene Conley of the Boston Red Sox (15), Bill Monbouquette of the Boston Red Sox (15), and Ed Rakow of the Kansas City Athletics (14), and 4 others, ending with Earl Wilson of the Boston Red Sox (12).
beat out by Dick Donovan of the Cleveland Indians (20), Gene Conley of the Boston Red Sox (15), Bill Monbouquette of the Boston Red Sox (15), and Ed Rakow of the Kansas City Athletics (14), and 4 others, ending with Earl Wilson of the Boston Red Sox (12).
-
Batting, pitching, fielding, personal, team, and awards data come from the archive at seanlahman.com. This database is copyright 1996-2014 by Sean Lahman. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Dave Wickersham of the 1962 Kansas City Athletics threw right-handed, played on a losing team, attended Ohio University, played in Municipal Stadium I, and was born in Pennsylvania.
Sources
- achievement score (1.3 see References)
- assists (22)
- complete games (3)
- double plays (2)
- games finished (8)
- games played (30)
- games started (9)
- innings pitched (110.0)
- putouts (7)
- saves (1)
- shutouts (0)
- strikeouts (61)
- strikeouts per nine innings (5.0)
- winning percentage (73.3%)
- wins (11)
- balks (0)
- earned run average (4.17)
- earned runs (51)
- errors (0)
- hit by pitch (8)
- hits (105)
- hits per nine innings (8.6)
- homers given up (13)
- homers per nine innings (1.1)
- intentional walks (1)
- losses (4)
- runs allowed (53)
- walks (43)
- walks per nine innings (3.5)
- wild pitches (1)
- age (27 yrs)
- batters faced (467)
- height (6'3")
- innings pitched per game (3.7)
- weight (188 lbs)
Sources
© Copyright 2016 OnlyBoth | Terms of Use | Markets | Solutions | Benchmarking

bad (1)