What's exceptional about Rick Honeycutt Los Angeles Dodgers 1986 ?
Seasons:
many assists; good control; season
In 1986, only Rick Honeycutt of the Los Angeles Dodgers had both as few walks (45) and as many assists (35).
closest were Bob Ojeda of the New York Mets (52, 37), Roger McDowell of the New York Mets (42, 30), John Tudor of the St. Louis Cardinals (53, 41), and Bob Tewksbury of the New York Yankees (31, 29), ending with Mitch Williams of the Texas Rangers (79, 10).
closest were Bob Ojeda of the New York Mets (52, 37), Roger McDowell of the New York Mets (42, 30), John Tudor of the St. Louis Cardinals (53, 41), and Bob Tewksbury of the New York Yankees (31, 29), ending with Mitch Williams of the Texas Rangers (79, 10).
-
Batting, pitching, fielding, personal, team, and awards data come from the archive at seanlahman.com. This database is copyright 1996-2014 by Sean Lahman. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Rick Honeycutt of the 1986 Los Angeles Dodgers threw left-handed, played on a losing team, attended the University of Tennessee, played in Dodger Stadium, and was born in Tennessee.
Sources
- salary ($755K)
- achievement score (.500 see References)
- assists (35)
- complete games (0)
- double plays (2)
- games finished (2)
- games played (32)
- games started (28)
- innings pitched (171.0)
- putouts (9)
- saves (0)
- shutouts (0)
- strikeouts (100)
- strikeouts per nine innings (5.3)
- winning percentage (55.0%)
- wins (11)
- balks (1)
- earned run average (3.32)
- earned runs (63)
- errors (1)
- hit by pitch (3)
- hits (164)
- hits per nine innings (8.6)
- homers given up (9)
- homers per nine innings (.5)
- intentional walks (4)
- losses (9)
- runs allowed (71)
- walks (45)
- walks per nine innings (2.4)
- wild pitches (4)
- age (32 yrs)
- batters faced (713)
- height (6'1")
- innings pitched per game (5.3)
- weight (185 lbs)
Sources
© Copyright 2016 OnlyBoth | Terms of Use | Markets | Solutions | Benchmarking

ambivalent (1)
bad (1)