What's exceptional about Jerry Reed Seattle Mariners 1989 ?
Seasons:
more wins; colleges attended
Jerry Reed of the 1989 Seattle Mariners had the most wins (7) of the 27 pitchers who attended Western Carolina University.
beat Jared Burton of the 2008 Cincinnati Reds (5), Jared Burton of the 2007 Cincinnati Reds (4), Mark DiFelice of the 2009 Milwaukee Brewers (4), and himself of the 1986 Seattle Mariners (4), and 22 others, ending with himself of the 1990 Seattle Mariners (0).
beat Jared Burton of the 2008 Cincinnati Reds (5), Jared Burton of the 2007 Cincinnati Reds (4), Mark DiFelice of the 2009 Milwaukee Brewers (4), and himself of the 1986 Seattle Mariners (4), and 22 others, ending with himself of the 1990 Seattle Mariners (0).
-
Batting, pitching, fielding, personal, team, and awards data come from the archive at seanlahman.com. This database is copyright 1996-2014 by Sean Lahman. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Jerry Reed of the 1989 Seattle Mariners threw right-handed, played on a losing team, attended Western Carolina University, played in Kingdome, and was born in North Carolina.
Sources
- salary ($265K)
- achievement score (.000 see References)
- assists (12)
- complete games (0)
- double plays (1)
- games finished (14)
- games played (52)
- games started (1)
- innings pitched (101.7)
- putouts (10)
- saves (0)
- shutouts (0)
- strikeouts (50)
- strikeouts per nine innings (4.4)
- winning percentage (50.0%)
- wins (7)
- balks (1)
- earned run average (3.19)
- earned runs (36)
- errors (0)
- hit by pitch (1)
- hits (89)
- hits per nine innings (7.9)
- homers given up (10)
- homers per nine innings (.9)
- intentional walks (10)
- losses (7)
- runs allowed (44)
- walks (43)
- walks per nine innings (3.8)
- wild pitches (5)
- age (34 yrs)
- batters faced (432)
- height (6'1")
- innings pitched per game (2.0)
- weight (190 lbs)
Sources
© Copyright 2016 OnlyBoth | Terms of Use | Markets | Solutions | Benchmarking

ambivalent (1)
bad (2)