What's exceptional about Matt Morris St. Louis Cardinals 1998 ?
Seasons:
many double plays; fewer putouts; season
In 1998, only Matt Morris of the St. Louis Cardinals had both as few putouts (4) and as many double plays (5).
closest were Steve Avery of the Boston Red Sox (7, 5), Mike Myers of the Milwaukee Brewers (3, 4), Brad Woodall of the Milwaukee Brewers (5, 4), and Hipolito Pichardo of the Kansas City Royals (11, 5), ending with David Cone of the New York Yankees (12, 3).
closest were Steve Avery of the Boston Red Sox (7, 5), Mike Myers of the Milwaukee Brewers (3, 4), Brad Woodall of the Milwaukee Brewers (5, 4), and Hipolito Pichardo of the Kansas City Royals (11, 5), ending with David Cone of the New York Yankees (12, 3).
-
Batting, pitching, fielding, personal, team, and awards data come from the archive at seanlahman.com. This database is copyright 1996-2014 by Sean Lahman. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Matt Morris of the 1998 St. Louis Cardinals threw right-handed, played on a winning team, attended Seton Hall University, played in Busch Stadium II, and was born in New York state.
Sources
- salary ($300K)
- achievement score (.600 see References)
- assists (17)
- complete games (2)
- double plays (5)
- games finished (0)
- games played (17)
- games started (17)
- innings pitched (113.7)
- putouts (4)
- saves (0)
- shutouts (1)
- strikeouts (79)
- strikeouts per nine innings (6.3)
- winning percentage (58.3%)
- wins (7)
- balks (0)
- earned run average (2.53)
- earned runs (32)
- errors (1)
- hit by pitch (3)
- hits (101)
- hits per nine innings (8.0)
- homers given up (8)
- homers per nine innings (.6)
- intentional walks (6)
- losses (5)
- runs allowed (37)
- walks (42)
- walks per nine innings (3.3)
- wild pitches (3)
- age (24 yrs)
- batters faced (468)
- height (6'5")
- innings pitched per game (6.7)
- weight (210 lbs)
Sources
© Copyright 2016 OnlyBoth | Terms of Use | Markets | Solutions | Benchmarking

good (1)
neutral (1)
bad (1)